Corporate communicators need to demonstrate a deep commercial understanding of the business issues their organisations face – this gives them credibility around the leadership table.
They operate in fast-moving and complex environments and need to be able to learn and adapt quickly.
Building strong relationships and networks with influencers and decision-makers (both internally and externally) is essential if they are to get things done.
There is little doubt that in the last 20 years we have witnessed the evolution of corporate communications from a predominantly PR orientated function to a more strategic all-encompassing management discipline.
This is in no small part due to the rise in the concept of the corporate brand – the idea that a company and what it stands for can provide added equity to its products and services as well as helping it to build relationships with a wide range of important internal and external stakeholders.
This change has led to the convergence of corporate strategy with corporate communications as companies seek to articulate their overriding purpose in a clear and compelling way.
What are the skills required by the modern corporate communicator?
Reputation Council members are adamant that the corporate communications function (or, more broadly speaking, corporate affairs) needs to be part of the strategic planning process. In other words, effective communications strategies can only be developed when senior communicators have an in-depth understanding of the business issues their organisations face:
However, many respondents also felt strongly that broader business knowledge was not the only priority for today’s communicator. So-called ‘soft skills’ including empathy, judgement, flexibility, sincerity and enthusiasm were seen as vitally important in gaining the respect and support of colleagues and external stakeholders alike:
Ultimately it’s about being seen as a trusted advisor
There was a clear consensus amongst Council members that the ultimate goal for most communicators was to be seen by the CEO and leadership team as a trusted advisor. The reason being that when this status is achieved it provides a powerful ‘platform’ for the effective co-ordination of reputation management activities – both internally and externally:
There’s no such thing as an average working day
Although it may well be a claim made by many functions within the corporate environment, there is no doubt that most Council members wholeheartedly believe that the average working day does not exist for them. The predominant view being that the nature of the corporate communications function within a global organisation means “that most of my days do not end up where I thought they were going to end at all.”
Council members work an average 60-hour week (not including periodic monitoring of emails over the weekend, which 88% of Council members do). This covers activity within the head office environment but also conference calls with colleagues from markets in different time zones. To varying degrees, respondents divide their time between planning activities (strategy development, meetings with communication colleagues and other functions such as HR, campaign development, etc.) and responding to internal requests as well as unexpected external events (including potentially damaging issues):
Single biggest frustration
In many cases the size and complexity of the organisation they work for lies at the heart of many of the frustrations cited by Council members. Specific issues mentioned include the relatively slow pace at which change can be achieved, the difficulty of gaining access to the right people and the challenges in aligning messages throughout the organisation:
Other frustrations include lack of resources and budget relative to the deliverables expected and lack of understanding or unrealistic expectations of the communications function – “expectation that communications can solve unsolvable problems”.
It’s clear Council members believe the corporate communications function has never been more important to the long-term performance and health of the organisations they work for, although it is also clear that the function is highly scrutinised for evidence of its impact on business performance.
Indeed, there are some individuals within the corporate environment who are still to be convinced that it should sit alongside other support functions such as HR and Marketing.
However, what is not in doubt is the determination of Reputation Council members to maintain the momentum that has driven communications and reputation management higher up the corporate agenda.
Methodology: 127 interviews conducted with Reputation Council members between April and August 2017.