Ipsos Corporate Reputation

Global Perspectives on Sector Reputations

Which industries are facing the greatest reputation challenges at the moment?

NORTH AMERICA

Media: 44%

Tech: 44%

Pharma: 31%

Despite lingering reputational issues still plaguing the financial services sector, the recent assault on media and tech means that these two industries are seen to be facing the greatest reputational challenges in North America. Each of these industries is named by 44% of Council members.

Beyond these two industries, pharmaceuticals now holds the third position in terms of reputational challenges at 31%. Cost and value continue to drive the conversation, and with the US government putting more of a spotlight on drug costs, these reputational challenges are likely to continue.

"[Media has] got a constant drumbeat of ‘fake news’, how do you overcome that?"
"These are self-inflicted wounds [in the tech industry] – companies are not thinking through the implications of their actions on their customers."
LATIN AMERICA

Construction: 50%

Energy: 41%

Mining: 34%

In Latin America, construction rises to the top as the industry facing the greatest reputational challenges this year (50%). A number of corruption charges have embroiled not only specific companies throughout the region but also politicians and civil servants.

Energy (41%) and mining (34%) round out the top three most challenged industries, predominantly due to environmental concerns and a perception that they bring limited benefits to the local markets.

"There is a public perception that mining pollutes, does not produce profits for the country, and is a group of companies that do not add local value but add value to those who extract the material and take it away."
EUROPE

Finance: 44%

Energy: 43%

Finance remains one of the industries facing the greatest reputational challenge in Europe (mentioned by 44% of Council members). In the words of one Council member, “this crisis has not been solved yet, given that the image reconstruction process appears to be very slow.”

Additional challenges for the financial services sector include cyber security concerns and emerging FinTech players challenging the traditional financial companies.

Energy also continues to face reputational challenges, cited by 43% of Council members in Europe. Issues continue to focus on environmental concerns, climate change, sustainability and consumer costs.

"When energy companies don’t immediately pass on price savings from a barrel of oil to a consumer or to a client, then the negative repercussions are there immediately."
ASIA PACIFIC

Finance: 88%

Energy: 71%

Media: 71%

Consistent with last year, the financial services industry continues to suffer reputational challenges in APAC, though mentions are higher this year at 88% (up from 73% in the last wave). Council members continue to cite the lingering effects of the financial crisis.

The energy sector is also mentioned more frequently than last year (71%), and while affordability and sustainability are still key reasons, government policy is now referenced far more frequently by Council members.

This year, media is also mentioned by 65% of Council members in APAC, with many attributing this to a changing media landscape as well as the resounding cry of ‘fake news’.

"The energy policy is a mess. Can’t separate from political environment."
"The Trump phenomenon and the constant hammering of ‘fake news’."

In full: how Reputation Council members around the world perceived each sector's reputation

Methodology: 154 interviews conducted with Reputation Council members between 25th June and 12th November 2018. Base: All Reputation Council members – Global (145), North America (16), Europe (80), Latin America (32), APAC (17).

Read more from the Reputation Council...

Read more from the Ipsos Corporate Reputation Team...

The Reputation Council Report 2018: Full Report

Welcome to the latest briefing from the Ipsos Reputation Council.

This – our thirteenth sitting – has been the biggest and most international yet, involving 154 senior communicators from 20 countries.

As Paul Polman, CEO of Unilever, once said: “reputation has a habit of arriving on foot and departing on horseback”. In the past year, a welter of high-profile reputation scandals affecting businesses, their leaders and even whole industry sectors has, once again, focused our minds on the risks and rewards of this powerful but potentially volatile asset.

Some of these scandals have posed a genuine threat to companies’ continued survival or licence to operate. Others have fizzled out. In this edition, we examine how Reputation Council members distinguish between issues which might blow up into a genuine reputation crisis, and others that are just day-to-day turbulence. What indicators or early warning systems can communicators draw on, to help them build resilience?

The technology sector has been wrestling with some unprecedented reputation issues recently. Concerns around privacy, data leaks, advertising practices, AI and automation have come together to create the phenomenon of ‘techlash’. We talk to Council members about the implications for their own businesses and the lessons that communicators can learn from the way in which the technology sector is responding to techlash.

We’re also beginning to see greater scrutiny of the role that CEOs should play in external communications, against a backdrop of issues such as pay ratio reporting, gender inequality, shrinking CEO tenures and the ‘celebrity leader’. In this edition, we explore Council members’ playbook for CEO-led communications, and look at how the CCO can ensure that these communications build, rather than destroy, reputation value.

The opportunities and challenges that come with communicating in a global context is a theme we’ve examined in past editions. In this sitting, we ask Council members how they strike the right balance between global and local messaging and narratives, and how they keep a finger on the pulse of their reputation (or reputations) around the world.

Lastly, we’ve introduced some new, ‘quickfire’ sections, in which we analyse Council members’ views on a number of contentious, topical talking points, such as the death of CSR, the distraction posed by social media, the need to pick a side in a polarising society, and whether consumers will overlook poor corporate behaviour if the price is right

I hope you enjoy this edition of the Reputation Council report. Please do get in touch if you’d like to find out more about any of the issues covered or discuss how they might affect your own business.

Milorad Ajder
Global Service Line Leader
Corporate Reputation
milorad.ajder@ipsos.com

Read more from the Reputation Council...

Read more from the Ipsos Corporate Reputation Team...

The role of the CEO in external communications

Communicators have to be selective about the frequency and nature of the top executive’s participation, balancing the benefits and risks of bringing a powerful voice into the conversation.

 

Use of the CEO as one of the company’s primary communicators is influenced by industry norms, the nature of the message, and the target audience – with cultural and generational differences in how stakeholders respond to a CEO as an important consideration.
Council members highlight the risk of the CEO’s personality and corporate identity becoming intertwined, as well as the potential to polarise media opinion.
The CEO must be regarded as credible, authentic, empathetic, and transparent if their communications are to have a positive impact. In some cases, other employees may have greater cut-through on a specific issue or with a certain audience.

 

Today, the toolbox of a communications professional is wider and deeper than ever before. From traditional resources such as press releases or spokespeople pertinent to the issue at hand, to newer methods such as social media, blogs or interactive multimedia platforms, the array of options is continually evolving. Within this modern environment, the medium and spokesperson can be as important as the message itself, with the decisions made by corporate communicators playing a crucial role in shaping the image the company is able to create for itself.

Among the decisions facing communicators is the role that the CEO should play in supporting stakeholder engagement. Here, the devil is in the detail.

On the whole, Reputation Council members see the Chief Executive as playing an important communications role. There is a caveat though: the leader is not a communications ‘silver bullet’. Their involvement should be assessed carefully, balancing risk and reward, with consideration given to whether the CEO’s personality and characteristics fit the specific brief.

"EVERY CEO SHOULD BE NAMED THE CHIEF REPUTATION OFFICER FOR HIS OR HER COMPANY."
Balancing risk and reward

In balancing the potential risk and reward of involving the CEO, Council members highlight some key factors to consider.

 

RISK

Overexposure. This could erode the impact of their voice and place unnecessary focus on less important issues.

"If people like me do their jobs well, then the nature of the enterprise should do the heavy lifting when it comes to external perceptions. If it were up to me, I would have the CEO out there three times per year and I hold them in reserve for really big issues or circuit breakers."

Difficulty in distinguishing the person from the company. High-profile CEOs can generate increased scrutiny and pose a challenge when personal views differ from the corporate position.

"It humanises a company, gives it personality and a vision. But the risks are that it becomes too connected with the individual and the personal behaviour impacts the business when they go off the rails, for example, in the case of Tesla."

Personality traits could undermine effectiveness.

"It’s important to speak for the company, but it depends on the CEO’s personality. They need to be comfortable on social media and able to speak on broad topics. The CEO can bring transparency to the company. It’s important to speak on business-critical issues, but there are some cases where the CEO can be too much – sometimes a rank-and-file employee is more authentic."

REWARD

Personification of the company’s values. The CEO is the company’s ambassador, conveying a vision and setting the company’s tone and image.

"We live in a media society that is more strongly personalised than before. If you have a CEO who is an authentic communicator, who is able to excite, then you have the best marketing or PR strategy possible."

A sense of authority. The CEO’s voice emphasises the importance of the message, maximising the chances of engagement.

"It is extremely important for a CEO to act as their company’s figurehead for communication. Nowadays, companies cannot be represented by their brands only: CEOs are required to play a primary role in their companies’ communication efforts because they are the decision-maker ultimately responsible for their companies’ actions."

The face of the company in a major crisis. Instilling confidence, being transparent and outlining short-term and long-term actions.

"I think when the company has an imminent crisis situation, with damages to third parties, the CEO needs to participate and communicate decisions around investments, continuity, etc. that affect stakeholders, be it employees, partners or suppliers."
The portrait of a top communicator

As one might expect, the CEO needs to be a well-rounded leader for him or her to run the organisation successfully. There are, however, useful characteristics to take into account when looking to apply their role to the world of communications. The views of the Reputation Council can be distilled into three guiding principles.

 

Credible and reliable

In order to come across as an authoritative figure in front of key stakeholder groups, competence in the job is essential, as well as a solid track record delivering on the company’s vision. Key audiences need to believe that the person in charge of the organisation is a capable individual who will be in the post beyond the short-term and can take decisive action to steer the company in the right direction.

"Firstly, a master of the brief, so you do need to know the detail, you need to be able to speak credibly to a number of people, know how much things cost, to be able to describe your operations properly, not just in a flippant way. That would be the foundation."

Charismatic, confident and empathetic

Successfully running the business is simply not enough for the CEO to become a valuable asset for the communications function. He or she needs to appeal to and captivate audiences. They need to be relatable but display confidence and a feeling of security both in the tone and content of the message.

"They need to be able to talk about what the business does in a way that engages and connects with people. If they are not good communicators, that will land flat. The role of a CEO has got to change. They have to have more of the softer skills. They need to know about consumers and stakeholders and what makes them tick. They need to be able to engage on issues of concern. But if they have no empathy or no grasp of the issues, the best communications brief in the world won’t help!"

Honest, transparent and authentic

Displaying genuine motivations, with the best intentions at heart, is also vital. The credibility of the message, the CEO themself and the entire company are all at risk if stakeholders do not sense authenticity.

"Truthfulness, transparency, honesty, commitment, passion. But most of all, in the end you express what you are and what a stakeholder expects: a real speech. We are working very hard on this: to have coherence between internal and external discourse, this discourse to be transparent, to not try to hide, seeking to have the greatest transparency and honesty. This is absolutely fundamental."
When the CEO becomes a celebrity

What happens when the CEO is so good at being the figurehead of the company that their name becomes synonymous with that of the organisation? Examples such as Steve Jobs at Apple, Richard Branson at Virgin or Elon Musk at Tesla come to mind. Very often, these are strategic choices made in the early years, where a founder seeks the spotlight to help boost the profile of the company.

Overall, Council members feel that this has proven a successful strategy in the past for many, but it is a tactic that should be carefully thought through.

There is a need to consider not only the profile and abilities of the individual, but also industry dynamics, cultural nuances and generational differences.

"The popularity itself is not bad, but it must be related to the business so that it is a healthy relationship for the company."
"I think celebrity CEOs are a very dangerous game to play. I think celebrity CEOs are a problem here. The tall poppy syndrome [being targeted for criticism due to their success] makes it difficult for a prominent voice to be sustainably successful. I don’t think it is a good model in the current era because this culture is quite oppressive when it comes to success. Less of an issue in the US, where a celebrity CEO still holds some value. I don’t think millennials or Gen Z are particularly interested or respectful of middle-aged men and women who run companies – they are much more interested in brands and movements."

All in all, Council members see some risks if the image of the company and CEO merge into one in the public eye.

In situations where the CEO is an appointed figure who will lead the company for a number of years, rather than the founder and essence of the company, their profile should be moderated accordingly.

"Unless it is your name above the door, unless you are Elon Musk, you need to be very careful that you are the guy who for a period of time is running this organisation and you are a hired hand to do so and at some stage, you will stop being the hired hand and someone else will come in. And as long as all CEOs act like that, they won’t go far wrong, but quite a few don’t act like that."
"Having a celebrity CEO can be helpful but can be a nightmare, especially for the PR department because media will polarise. If they have built this profile around them and they might run their own Twitter account or something, it is very hard to manage the flow of communication and the content of communication. On one hand, that is good for transparency and openness, but on the other hand, he or she might need the time to evaluate information and talk to his or her lieutenants before making comments."

Final thoughts

Call on your CEO, but do so after careful consideration.

A communications strategy is successful when it’s able to deliver a clear and compelling message to the audience it is trying to address.

The company needs to act like a well-coordinated orchestra to deliver a compelling symphony.

The communications professional, as the conductor, can achieve this with a greater array of instruments than ever before. Here, the CEO can play the lead tenor or soprano able to unlock attention and convey the essence of the ensemble in a way no one else can.

However, like the valuable resource that they are, the CEO needs to appear at the right time and in coordination with the rest of the company.

Methodology: 154 interviews conducted with Reputation Council members between 25th June and 12th November 2018.

Read more from the Reputation Council...

Read more from the Ipsos Corporate Reputation Team...